African leaders’ failure is based [though not limited to] on luck of attachment to the culture, history and pride of the countries they lead. Many such leaders get into power by force and end up acting as direct transplants of white colonial masters who ruled African societies as economic entities–hence financial greed that leads to a vicious cycle of oppression.
Uganda’s Museveni is best example of a leaders presiding over a country with many indigenous communities with a rich cultural history but he has no single attachment to any one of them hence as an occupation force, he is bent on destroying them.
[Ankole, Tooro, Teeso, Bunyoro, Buganda, Busoga Madi, Karamajong etc] are examples of communities with all qualities needed to push for own independence and Catalonia has proved its achievable
If the new world order recognizes ‘states’ as sovereignty of a particular group, then natural indigenous groups should resume a fight for autonomy from ‘local’ colonial masters.
The Catalonian independence push, to be understood, addressed and hopefully solved peacefully, needs to be seen beyond constitutional legalities in the context of what sovereignty and self- determination mean for societies.
The right of political self-determination is fundamental for any organized society. Historically and factually, this right is the ultimate basis of most existing sovereign states (unless of course a state claims conquest as its raison d’être). Neither history nor social evolution has finished and, therefore, this right still exists, as act or potency.
While self-determination may be limited or wholly unacceptable within a certain constitutional arrangement, it cannot be ignored based on today’s frontiers or much less dismissed in international politics. We do not need to remember the numerous states that have been born in Europe over the last quarter of a century. Despite its bad reputation, nationalism is alive and well, not only in Catalonia but as the engine of any sovereign state, including Spain.
The soundness of the efforts of any society seeking political autonomy from an existing state can only be measured by its social weight; that is, by matters such as population strength, unity of purpose, consistency and relative political strength. In the short term, its legitimacy may be questioned by the constitutional structure where such society sits, but such efforts cannot be dismissed as a social force capable of effecting change. This is just a long way of saying that sovereignty ultimately resides with the people.
Whether or not the historical roots, social comparisons, or ideological grounds argued by a society seeking sovereignty are valid or false is irrelevant. Whether or not Catalonia had its autonomy before in 1714 only to lose it is inconsequential.
Ranking the validity of Catalonia’s aspirations with other societies is a useless exercise. Whether or not the Catalonian children are being brainwashed, as some people claim, is also a sterile discussion.
The truth about such allegations will not add or lessen the ultimate weight of the social force, whatever that might be. For societies that have sovereign ambitions, such as Catalonia, what finally matters is whether or not they can present a case in a form and substance that is finally accepted in the international order.
In this context, a peaceful claim, such as the Catalonian’s, does mean a lot in today’s world, at least among civilized nations.
Rightly so, the duty of any responsible government is to uphold and defend its constitutional order. The Spanish government is formally correct in disputing the Catalonian sovereignty movement viewing the recent independence referendum as illegal. But the responsibility of a mature government goes beyond being just the defender of its state’s existing order and the enforcer of its legal establishment.
Unfortunately, this seems to be the narrow position that the Spanish government has taken during this entire dispute. A government is also responsible for ensuring that society can operate harmoniously to fulfill its peoples’ needs. The Spanish government has utterly failed at this higher responsibility. It has completely dismissed all the warnings that Catalonia has been giving for years on its aims for more autonomy and has refused any dialogue that could lead to a challenge of the current constitutional scaffolding.
As background noise, although quite effective, a good portion of the Spanish mainstream media has mimicked the government’s position chanting for Spain’s uncompromising unity. The Catalonian independent movement is incoherently being accused of having Nazi, anarchist and leftist roots. The independence referendum has disjointedly been characterized as non-existent, defective and illegal. The proverbial Russian interference has, of course, been flagged as well.
It needs to be emphasized that no constitutional order is frozen. The tragi-comic re-writing of constitutions by South American republics until recent times does not belittle the good reasons for social evolution.
In today’s battle of wills between the Spanish government and the majority of Catalonians (majority that today cannot be disputed), only a negotiation leading to effective federalism seems to be the realistic path for reconciliation within a united Spain.
Article originally published at Euro-Asiareview